Child support not related to driving

Targeting parents who owe child support by suspending their driver's licenses is a farce.

Maybe we need to be careful what we do. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

Might we be creating increased social problems?

Sure, impound drivers for driving-related offences and behavior.

But the alarm is the licence suspension or vehicle impoundment for non-payment of child support.

There is no relationship between the two matters. We can't punish a non-driver equally, so is it unconstitutional?

This is pure bullying, at which the government is prolific.

Impounding or suspending might cause loss of employment and hurt the children more. Dumb.

Some parental splits are caused by the custodial parent, this suspension may escalate retaliation or generate counter-violence.

This law is morally wrong and poorly thought out. Judges need to consider it invalid.

The social costs of such a law will only increase everyone's tax bill--in direct contravention to the government's lies that
passing such draconian child support laws will save taxpayers money. Government has never saved taxpayers any money:
e.g., Post Office debacle, Social Security & Medicare debacle, welfare debacle, now Obamacare debacle).

Due to impound charges, the well intentioned person may never be able to afford to retrieve the vehicle, nor work again. Dumb.

Why the race by governments to speed up the destruction of our society?

_____________________________________________________________________________