The IV-D program is grounded in both federal and state statutes as well as judicial rules and procedures. The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) within the Department of Health & Human Services of each state is the single state agency charged with administering the IV- D program in the respective states. The federal statutory basis for the program is U.S. Public Law 93-647, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. Each state has a similar state statutory basis.
The policies and procedures that govern most aspects of the child support program in each state are the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in 45 CFR, Parts 232 and 301 to 308; state child support statutes; and state Rules of Court. Additionally, existing policies and procedures may be affected by case law as well as court and judicial proceedings.
No where in the Code of Federal Regulations or Federal Child Support statutes (42 U.S.C. Sections 659-671) does it allow for the incarceration/imprisonment of anyone for child support debts.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
A Basic Title IV-D Fact
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
That's the scam!!! The legal gestapo impressions for contempt. They take contempt charges, be it truancy to child support, and bastardize it with lack of discovery, to lack of representation. They pray on the weak/poor to help round up their already absorbent salaries. All the while destroying the very people, laws and ethics they've SWORE to protect and serve.
ReplyDeleteTHE USA HAS,
5% of the worlds population, 25% of the worlds imprisoned population and 50% of those are non-violent offenders. Home of the free????
Harrison
What do you expect from a country that has adopted anti-American, Soviet-Marxist child support & alimony laws. Child support was adopted by the radical feminist groups and womens' bar associations from Article 81 of the Soviet Family Law. That law calls for 30% of gross income for 2 kids. Alimony comes from Soviet Family Law, Articles 55-92. This says that even if the women remarries or fakes she needs alimony, she will get it. And, how much you ask? Whatever is left of the man's money after child support can theoretically all go to pay the alimony.
ReplyDeleteJudges, child support caseworkers, DAs, law enforcement, politicians, etc. ALL took an Oath of Office to uphold, support & defend the US Constitution. By taking this Oath, they ALL recognize and acknowledge We the People's fundamentally-secured constitutional rights--as a condition of their public employment. Since they've adopted these anti-American, Soviet-Marxist laws in this country, all public officials involved have violated their Oaths of Office, which constitutes felony Official Misconduct. It also constitutes treason & sedition. Not only is are these felony criminal offenses, unconstitutional conflicts-of-interest, and impeachable offenses, any laws, rules, orders or judgments made, are ALL null & void because these felony violators of the US Constitution are without authority & jurisdiction.
Bruce Eden, Civil Rights Director
DADS (Dads Against Discrimination)
b_eden@verizon.net
...and it is only getting worse, not better. Gov't gone wild!
ReplyDeleteThanks for all your contributions and insight in this blog and elsewhere Bruce, hopefully someday all these problems will get resolved and be a thing of the past, a mistake humanity will never repeat.
@Harrison, their ace in the hole brother! the "contempt" card they play makes the constitution even less relevent.....
Perfect timing again, Jim! I was just about to spend hours researching federal law for all their child support regulations, and there it is right on the FramedFather Blog!
ReplyDeleteTwo states are still pursuing me for a 'fictitious obligation' that everyone involved knows I DO NOT OWE, which is a class B federal felony under 18 U.S.C. 514. I reported the crime spree in the child support program to the FEDS, but as you probably know they are racketeering right along with the states so they can go to Congress and ask for larger and larger appropriations each year.
As you know, I was falsely arrested for the 5th time this past Summer. The state of Minnesota is taking it all the way to a jury trial in Feb 2001.
I'm looking for SPONSORS for my family in our lawsuits against the states and now the United States. I've created a new website: http://www.mnfix.webs.com. Anyone can sponsor us, even anonymously, and I am planning to reimburse and reward everyone from any jury awards.
Could you write a short article about my family's plight, Jim, and spread around my website on your Blog and website? I will be posting a link to yours on mine as well. Thanks for all you do for families.
Harrison and Bruce and all others striving for father's rights: I'm trying to think up and set up all sorts of ways for other poor parents and Pro Se litigants like myself to get involved. For one example, I am looking for 50-100 people for letter-writing campaigns, to write 1 or 2 letters per month in support of each other's cases. See my website for more information. Let me know if you are interested or have ideas for me.
I hope all you guys are well and will be able to spend some quality time with your kids this Holiday Season. This will be the 5th Christmas in a row that my kids and I will not see each other.
Make it a good one,
John